Brandon Nakashima vs Raphael Collignon Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Collignon and Nakashima display a close contest in second serve points won, with Collignon at 45.23% and Nakashima slightly ahead at 47.93%. Could Nakashima capitalize on this small advantage?
• When it comes to returning second serves, Collignon excels with a 48.93% win rate over Nakashima’s 40.65%, indicating a potential edge in return games.
• For first serve returns, Collignon again leads, winning 25.76% compared to Nakashima’s 22.05%. This could be pivotal in breaking serve.
• Under high-pressure situations, Nakashima has a slightly higher success in saving breakpoints with 55.25% compared to Collignon’s 53.36%, suggesting resilience.
• Collignon has a superior overall match win percentage of 74.71% over the past year, while Nakashima trails at 56.76%. Does this indicate a stronger overall performance?
• Surface preferences show Collignon thrives on Clay (74% wins), whereas Nakashima performs best on indoor hard courts (70% wins).
• In terms of tournament level, Collignon dominates the Challengers/ITF circuit, but Nakashima competes on the Main tour, facing tougher opponents ranked on average at 86.73 compared to Collignon’s 281.49.
• Nakashima leads their only past encounter, defeating Collignon in straight sets on an indoor hard court, perhaps indicating mental advantage.
• If the match reaches a deciding set, Collignon could hold an advantage, having won 65% of such scenarios compared to Nakashima’s 52%.
• When facing breakpoints, Nakashima has been more efficient, converting 36.71% of chances; this might give him the upper hand in crucial moments.

Editorial Prediction (May 18, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Collignon and Nakashima promises a competitive encounter, with each player having distinct strengths.

Collignon demonstrates impressive performance on clay and a higher win percentage over the last year, but faces a formidable opponent in Nakashima who competes at a higher tour level against tougher opponents.

Nakashima's slight advantage in second serve points, combined with his historical win against Collignon and better breakpoint conversion, presents a compelling case for his victory.

Given these factors, Nakashima is favored to win the match, leveraging his advantages in critical game aspects and past success against Collignon.